Birthday Verse For A Gran

WE!!

The quorum of signatures needed to present the petition to the Municipal Consgilio Rottofreno for the formation and implementation of a "rules for the exercise of the popular initiative" is been eclipsed.

had to collect, according to City Charter, the signatures of at least 2% of the population residing in our City on 31 December last year (9 days ago ...). This meant collecting at least 250 signatures. The Steering Committee will meet briefly this evening to do the counting, but counting from an initial estimate to be close to twice the necessary signatures.

This is also why we preferred to minimize the time of collection (ten working days) instead focus on the number of signatures. In fact, given the bureaucratic times we prefer to present the petition as soon as possible.

Tomorrow morning, January 9, 2009 will present the protocol of the City's request.

It 's a very important moment in the history of our territory, for the first time a popular movement to force the council to draw up, in a formal way and finally in a non- long overdue, the only official power to intervene direttamennte citizenship and actively in the work of both the Board that the City Council.

thanks go to all those who day after day they knocked on doors, they turned the streets and squares of the town to ask for signatures, exposing all the reasons for the petition, thanks to the various merchants of shops and bars who have helped in the collection.

The population responded in a participatory manner and aware at this our first project and this we are particularly proud and happy.

Now the presentation. After that, wait (Within the time allowed by statute as well ... not sure if they remember the nostriamministratori) that the issue should be discussed, that we have prepared the draft regulation is adopted, and that our community has also finalmene his REGULATIONS THE PURSUIT OF POPULAR PARTICIPATION.

Lynsey Dawn Mckensie 4 Weddinhgs

third drug - CORRECTION REQUIRED

view of proper behavior that we seek to maintain, as a committee, we wish to correct an article we published a few days ago and since we have eliminated based on incomplete information in our possession.

We said, if I remember that the number of these pharmacies on a municipal area was determined by the Law No. 8 November 1991. 362 which says that pharmacies in communities with fewer than 12,550 inhabitants may be one for every 5,000 people. If so, then Rottofreno (which had just over 11,000 inhabitants at the end of October 2009) could not be opened the third pharmacy.

Well, when you are wrong you need to have fairness and intellectual honesty to admit it. Indeed, the information in our possession were partial and not complete.

E 'enough, in fact, read the resolution of the City Council to realize that the management and periodic review of so-called "organic plants" of pharmacies have been delegated to the Provinces with Regional Law 3 / 1999.

So that the County Council with its resolution number 119 of 01.12.2008 approved the revised staffing plan of urban and rural pharmacies in the province of Piacenza for the year 2008, which approved the request for the establishment the third pharmacy in the village area of \u200b\u200bRottingdean.

After deliberation with the provincial leaders No 292 of 23/02/2009 was prepared to award the City of Rottingdean seat pharmaceutical n.3 urban, newly established by locating nerlla village of San Nicolo. Finally, a note dated 27/02/2009 prot. 0016461 the same Province informed the City of Rottingdean on the ownership of the pharmacy same priority by the City Council by Resolution No. 4 of 12/02/2009 Recommend.

remains the use of the TAR made by the proprietor of the pharmacy of St. Nicholas, an appeal that we may know before you give at this point, additional reviews.

We trust that both you and the same administration.

Our goal, in fact, is not to be "against whatever" but is to be "an incentive anyway."

Monster Energy Backbags

TANGENZIALINA of Rottofreno: SPEECH BY THE VICE-MAYOR PEROTTI'.... HERE ON FREEDOM CAT CI COVA ....

We take inspiration from intervention of the Vice-Mayor John Perry appeared in the "Opinions" on page 45 of Freedom on January 4 last year.

Perotti measures in response to a previous writing appeared on the same day by Mr. Romano Braga as a member of the association "Polislab" of St. Nicholas.

Frankly we discuss several issues on which both the parties concerned but it seems more important to focus on the part of the article by Perotti, concerning the so-called tangenzialina of Rottingdean.

verbatim as stated by Vice-Mayor : "... The tangenzialina of Rottofreno: is the stretch of road that is designed to connect the eastern part of the country with the Via Emilia. The city administration is available to revise the initial project approved PRG in 2005 and already funded through a program agreement with the lottizzante, according to a breeze to find an alternate route via Rome and more functional for the citizens of the capital. The city administration has not taken any action at the time Executive about why it is very keen to find an alternative solution more appropriate to the development of the country and the demands of the citizens of this district.

We reiterate our intention to make choices that are the result of a participated and shared with citizens. It should, however, that the public know that the change of the project during construction, involves the use of new planning instruments and especially the finding financial resources for this purpose and that this is not easy nor it can achieve in the short term ..... "

At this point, some questions naturally arises:

1) The municipal council not yet adopted any executive action in regard ? But the famous" Council Resolution "to cancel ' agreement with the manufacturer touted by Vice-Mayor in front of over seventy people, exist or not exist? If there is this resolution, but will appear somewhere. However, if you wanted something different, that was a declaration of intent , necessary to use the right terms. A resolution is a resolution, an intention is an intention ... two completely different things. We, for a few days, I look more "confident" of having proof that the words spent in that meeting were the correct ones, if they ask a different account. E 'policy requires that those who want to learn to respect their partners, beginning with what you said them.

2) The funds are obtained each time the juice becomes the speeches made by administrators. Ch a chant knows more scapegoat than real motivation. In this case, it is our opinion that the disbursements that may be necessary to achieve of a true "tangenzialina" to the east of (and not a horrendous "fallback" as that envisaged in the agreement by lottizzante) could be contained or overcome by little, in the amounts agreed precedentente and, as Perry says, already funded. Our Deputy Mayor will be aware that all "acts / documents" in support of a subdivision are public and therefore available. Imagine, therefore, that we know the estimated costs of the previous work, costs split 50% each between lottizzante (which was also carrying the work load) and the City of Rottingdean. Well, for the modest sum of 804,960.00 (ottocentoquattromila960 €) excluding VAT, of which 81,960.00 only the technical costs, as stated in paragraph 7. Economic pane of the technical report submitted and approved in the above, we believe we can begin designing groped at least (since the money is there already), without waiting for additional new planning instruments .....

Maybe we oversimplify things, but there is, in this scenario those who excessively complicated. However we will return shortly to the question. This is our first objective and will not let this "limbo" once again. The case is resolved, no ifs, ands or buts, in full transparency and in full compliance of all concerned ... of all shapes!