We take inspiration from intervention of the Vice-Mayor John Perry appeared in the "Opinions" on page 45 of Freedom on January 4 last year. Perotti measures in response to a previous writing appeared on the same day by Mr. Romano Braga as a member of the association "Polislab" of St. Nicholas.
Frankly we discuss several issues on which both the parties concerned but it seems more important to focus on the part of the article by Perotti, concerning the so-called tangenzialina of Rottingdean.
verbatim as stated by Vice-Mayor : "... The tangenzialina of Rottofreno: is the stretch of road that is designed to connect the eastern part of the country with the Via Emilia. The city administration is available to revise the initial project approved PRG in 2005 and already funded through a program agreement with the lottizzante, according to a breeze to find an alternate route via Rome and more functional for the citizens of the capital. The city administration has not taken any action at the time Executive about why it is very keen to find an alternative solution more appropriate to the development of the country and the demands of the citizens of this district.
We reiterate our intention to make choices that are the result of a participated and shared with citizens. It should, however, that the public know that the change of the project during construction, involves the use of new planning instruments and especially the finding financial resources for this purpose and that this is not easy nor it can achieve in the short term ..... "
At this point, some questions naturally arises: 1) The municipal council not yet adopted any executive action in regard ? But the famous" Council Resolution "to cancel ' agreement with the manufacturer touted by Vice-Mayor in front of over seventy people, exist or not exist? If there is this resolution, but will appear somewhere. However, if you wanted something different, that was a declaration of intent , necessary to use the right terms. A resolution is a resolution, an intention is an intention ... two completely different things. We, for a few days, I look more "confident" of having proof that the words spent in that meeting were the correct ones, if they ask a different account. E 'policy requires that those who want to learn to respect their partners, beginning with what you said them.
2) The funds are obtained each time the juice becomes the speeches made by administrators. Ch a chant knows more scapegoat than real motivation. In this case, it is our opinion that the disbursements that may be necessary to achieve of a true "tangenzialina" to the east of (and not a horrendous "fallback" as that envisaged in the agreement by lottizzante) could be contained or overcome by little, in the amounts agreed precedentente and, as Perry says, already funded. Our Deputy Mayor will be aware that all "acts / documents" in support of a subdivision are public and therefore available. Imagine, therefore, that we know the estimated costs of the previous work, costs split 50% each between lottizzante (which was also carrying the work load) and the City of Rottingdean. Well, for the modest sum of 804,960.00 (ottocentoquattromila960 €) excluding VAT, of which 81,960.00 only the technical costs, as stated in paragraph 7. Economic pane of the technical report submitted and approved in the above, we believe we can begin designing groped at least (since the money is there already), without waiting for additional new planning instruments .....
Maybe we oversimplify things, but there is, in this scenario those who excessively complicated. However we will return shortly to the question. This is our first objective and will not let this "limbo" once again. The case is resolved, no ifs, ands or buts, in full transparency and in full compliance of all concerned ... of all shapes!
0 comments:
Post a Comment