PLAYING THE PERCENTAGES OF THE SHAFT OF MILK, HONEY 
But who will benefit at the end of the expected high number of "lists" in the running for the Town Councils of Rottingdean in 2011?
The answer is simple: TO ALL!
It is not an obvious answer or rhetoric. Think about it: there will be more lists and the lower the percentage of votes needed to win the electoral contest.
The example is the last elections in 2006, when there were "only" four lists in comparison to "Maserati" got the administration of our town with only 32% of votes! Thanks to the perverse mechanism in use, with 1,978 votes in the winning team (?) has placed, in addition to the Mayor, well 12 (read twelve) between assessors and advisers of the majority.
one that was ranked second (Sartori) They get 310 votes in less than winning (or a total of 1,668 votes = 27%) is "only" by Sartori and Bottazzi. Borotto who got the third "position" with 1,351 votes (22%), which is the same difference that existed between Maserati and Sartori, is also entered in the Council accompanied by Zanoni. Not so good is that Gandolfini went to preferences while collecting 1,177 (19%) and "passive" all alone.
What happened then then, worth a quick review. The majority of advisers Mori (vice mayor ousted by yet another Maserati) and Cattivelli have sided with the council in opposition, while the director of minority Borotto, having "seduced" the League's Zanoni had "abandoned", as expected, by a perfect leap of quail "in the pews of a majority in the face of those who had voted. The wonderful world of politicians (or politicians?) Is the same, both in Rome and in Rottingdean .... how nice!
To end the discussion is interesting to note that in most sit advisors and counselors who have obtained a number of preferences significantly lower in people who have remained at home. An example: in addition to the current vice-mayor (113 preferences) the best placed is the nigger that he's had 98. Well the list of Sartori, who is Antelmi Monti had obtained higher performances. Finally it is good to focus on the choice of assessors made by Maserati: the commissioner who handles most of the municipal budget or Mrs. Fernanda Cerri was the beauty of 35 (you read that right is thirty-five) preferences, and that said the councilor for urban planning (strategic another department) Tegg? Forty-five votes. And we end with the Public Works, or Panizzari: less than 43 votes.
And we're talking about the third largest municipality in the Province ... mica Zerba (with all Zerba and respect for its inhabitants).
So, back to skyrocket, the percentages with which there probably will be assigned the new administration (as they are provided from five to seven bands .... except for last minute additions), which also occurred action resulted in the past .... there is much to be happy! Indeed ..........
